Defend the per vote subsidy

When Stephen Harper killed Jean Chretien's per vote party subsidy the public then knew that they had an undemocratic dictator who was going to use any trick to keep power. The per vote subsidy encourages voting. It means that even if your candidate/party loses you can still help them by voting. It is truly good! To those politicians and pundits who cynically put negative spin on this beneficial mechanism I would say, "So you would do the same as Stephen Harper did the day he stabbed our democracy in the back?"

Official response from submitted

Hello Korry, 

Thank you very much for your thoughtful feedback. And this is a great way to look at the per-vote allowance! With the new legislation everyone is able to support their political party of their choosing. We greatly appreciate your support!

Reactions

How would you tag this suggestion?
Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • responded with submitted 2017-10-13 13:19:33 -0700
  • posted about this on Facebook 2017-09-22 21:51:40 -0700
    Ban big money bill: Defend the per vote subsidy
  • published this page in Ban big money bill 2017-09-22 21:51:13 -0700
Donate Get Involved