Texas state official Jerry Patterson is quoted in an Associated Press story as saying,
"The best-case scenario is for most of the slick to remain in the Gulf for at least several days and congeal into small tar balls that wash up further south on the Texas coast, where they could be picked up and removed.”
Would British Columbians accept this as the kind of ‘world-leading’ response in the Douglas Channel?
The spill shut down the shipping channel, stifling the important economic activity of the port. There is not just the looming environmental disaster but also the tremendous economic pressure that is building under the Texas oil recovery teams. What if this spill was in Vancouver – Canada’s busiest port? What would a closure of the Port of Vancouver do to our provincial and national economy? Would we sacrifice a “world-leading oil response” to allow commerce to continue?
We have seen examples of the dangers of trafficking oil, especially heavy oil and diluted bitumen. Unfortunately, the federal and provincial governments are willing to play Russian roulette with the environment and economy. It is time to stop gambling with our livelihood and well-being. We must have the courage to act now and reduce our addiction to fossil fuels.
As Robert Kennedy Jr. said at the GLOBE 2014 conference in Vancouver, “good environmental policy is always good economic policy.”