Per Vote Subsidy

I was surprised to learn that tax payers would be funding parties in this fashion as it was not discussed openly during the election. I do understand that this is common in other provincial jurisdictions, but still.... I'd be interested to know the comparison between the dollar amounts i.e. tax credits issued for individual donations vs the anticipated monies such a subsidy may generate, for interest sake I suppose.

Official response from submitted

We appreciate your feedback Cary, thank you. I also wondered when I first heard about the allowance, why parties can’t just quit cold turkey. After all - it worked for the BC Greens! It turns out, that approach could actually be really dangerous for our democracy. So the way I see it, the per-vote allowance gives all parties a chance to get rid of corporate donations right away, while continuing the essential work they do for democracy in BC - talking to voters, supporting MLAs and developing policy ideas. That’s one of the reasons our BC Green MLAs support the government’s bill.  The most important thing is to get big money out of politics as soon as possible.

The green caucus did not enter negotiations seeking an allowance, however, compromised with the NDP government. Additionally, details will become more clear as the bill passes through its readings in the legislature. 

Reactions

How would you tag this suggestion?
Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Kelsey Reid
    responded with submitted 2017-10-13 13:05:05 -0700
  • Cary Gryba
    published this page in Ban big money bill 2017-09-21 20:48:08 -0700
Donate Get Involved