BC at a crossroads

B.C. finds itself at a crossroads.

It has a clear choice to make: do we support our government’s generational sellout to fulfill its hyperbolic election campaign promises — an all-in approach on LNG — or do we instead continue down the path we started to take in 2008 where we established our continent leading climate policies?

Today marked the 8th day of debate in the legislature on a bill that is a cornerstone of the government’s LNG agenda.

This bill connects two major parts of my life – my career as a climate scientist, and ultimately my decision to run in the last provincial election.

For 20 years I worked as a climate scientist and an educator.

I studied the impacts global warming would have on our communities and I shared that knowledge with young people in my classes and in our schools.

As a scientist, I worked with the B.C. government back in 2008 to develop bold new climate policies for our province. Those policies made us a leader in North America.

In the last 6 years, we have successfully reduced our GHG emissions, while forging a path for our economy that was both economically and environmentally sustainable.

All of that work--all of the progress that we as a province have made in addressing global warming--came to a head this week as we debated a bill that threatens to put it all at risk.

Titled the “Greenhouse Gas Industrial Reporting and Control Act”, this bill would lock us into a path of increasing greenhouse gas emissions, while foregoing the development of a truly diversified and sustainable 21st century economy.

To be clear, I am not opposed to the idea that LNG and the natural gas industry may have a role to play in our economy going forward. But a revitalized gas industry should arise if the market determines it is time for it to do so, not because the government hopes it is time for it to do so.

What I am opposed to, is the government laying out a means to give away our province’s resources in order to land an irresponsible political promise, one that is filled with hyperbole, lacking of substance and void of information and detail. Their approach amounts to a generational sellout.

Most troubling of all is that attempting to realize the government's LNG pipedream necessitates British Columbia walking away from its climate leadership and turning its back on the blossoming economic opportunities that have accompanied this leadership.

As I oppose this bill, and the governments irresponsible and short sighted LNG agenda, I also think it is important to remember that we have another option.

Earlier in the session, I laid out a different vision for a diversified, sustainable, 21st century economy. With new investments in education, a return to properly funded government services and a focus on developing diversified and sustainable economic opportunities, we have an opportunity to build a true 21st century economy here in British Columbia.

As we debate this bill, I would like to invite you to read more about this opportunity. I would also like to invite you to send me your thoughts so that together, we can move our vision forward.

To read more about a diversified and sustainable 21st century economy, please click here.

Page activities

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Mona Helcermanas-Benge
    commented 2014-12-14 16:43:55 -0800
    Resolutions and letters requesting a ban on 1000’ LNG Supertankers in Howe Sound and along the Georgia/Haro Straits shipping route to the ocean have been passed and sent to the federal Minister of Transport in Ottawa. This cooperative move has been made by the majority of Regional Districts and Municipalities in the Howe Sound region. It appears that the Premier is so determined to see an LNG plant and the accompanying supertankers in Howe Sound that she has become the lobbying arm of the industry and this proposal in particular. It is an outrageous misuse of political power and all who live in and visit Howe Sound will pay the price for 25 years or more if she is successful.
  • Daphne M. Taylor
    commented 2014-11-07 14:50:28 -0800
    I am totally against LNG exploration, as well as fracking (both for env. reasons and terrible waste4 of our precious water) and BC needs to move quickly to clean energy. As Guy Dauncey aptly says BC could be 100% energy efficient if we put both our minds and moiney into it. Daphne M. Taylor
Donate Get Involved