Sounds great, but are public funds needed?

The BC greens raised money without corporate or union donations. Isn't that enough to run a good campaign? That said, the taxpayer is already funding donations via tax credits. Haven't read the bill, but financing on a per-vote basis might be preferable if it's one or the other. I too got forced to sign up and lost my first draft. Annoying.

Official response from submitted

We appreciate your feedback Donald, thank you. I also wondered when I first heard about the allowance, why parties can’t just quit cold turkey. After all - it worked for the BC Greens! It turns out, that approach could actually be really dangerous for our democracy. Other parties rely so heavily on big money that this bill takes away half their income. Any business owner will tell you that losing half your revenue all at once will pretty much put you out of business.

So the way I see it, the per-vote allowance gives all parties a chance to get rid of corporate donations right away, while continuing the essential work they do for democracy in BC - talking to voters, supporting MLAs and developing policy ideas. That’s one of the reasons our BC Green MLAs support the government’s bill.  The most important thing is to get big money out of politics as soon as possible.


How would you tag this suggestion?
Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Kelsey Reid
    responded with submitted 2017-10-13 12:56:38 -0700
  • Donald Gillmore
    published this page in Ban big money bill 2017-09-21 20:15:16 -0700
Donate Get Involved